tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7362548356445399702.post5234000591600514152..comments2023-06-28T16:42:39.911+08:00Comments on ED's All About Computer: Thunderbird Vs. OutlookE.D. (a.k.a. Erwin D.)http://www.blogger.com/profile/13544614103541802648noreply@blogger.comBlogger4125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7362548356445399702.post-28556823831829694062012-02-04T03:04:48.732+08:002012-02-04T03:04:48.732+08:00Hi Alex,
Thanks for sharing that interesting soft...Hi Alex,<br /><br />Thanks for sharing that interesting software.E.D. (a.k.a. Erwin D.)https://www.blogger.com/profile/13544614103541802648noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7362548356445399702.post-91459152000176293812012-02-03T06:55:48.935+08:002012-02-03T06:55:48.935+08:00Restore outlook .pst data you can do owing to rest...Restore outlook .pst data you can do owing to <a href="http://www.recoverytoolbox.com/outlook.html" rel="nofollow">restore outlook</a>. The application works under low system requirements, compatible with any version of Windows OS.Alexhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02892788277177092618noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7362548356445399702.post-21090905338869931732011-05-14T10:45:50.480+08:002011-05-14T10:45:50.480+08:00Hi Michael,
Thanks for your comment. I'm usi...Hi Michael,<br /><br />Thanks for your comment. I'm using both email clients. Outlook at work and Thunderbird for my personal use. Both of them has their good and not that good features. It all depends on the user's preference. With regards to POP and IMAP I prefer to use the IMAP. Even for my personal use I prefer to use the IMAP feature of GMail which works very well with Thunderbird. <br /><br />EdE.D. (a.k.a. Erwin D.)https://www.blogger.com/profile/13544614103541802648noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7362548356445399702.post-14219024451947942602011-05-09T23:32:37.105+08:002011-05-09T23:32:37.105+08:00Good write up.
you were very non-biased.
The vast ...Good write up.<br />you were very non-biased.<br />The vast majority of comparisons sum things up "Outlook trounces Thunderbird" ... not sure why for an email application it would beat it. They both send and receive email, that is their primary goal. <br /><br /><br />I have been using thunderbird since 2003 (before that I used the mail client in the Mozilla suite), all within the business world. Email is not that complicated, and Outlook is definitely not needed unless imap pop and smtp are not exposed to you. <br /><br /><br />Outlook works fine, I used to use it, but stopped using it in 1999 as I switched to Linux. I hate Outlook (2003+) from a support standpoint as its much more of a pain to troubleshoot issues than Thunderbird.<br /><br />In the Workplace:<br />If you have the ability to use Thunderbird, and you like it, use it. If you have outlook installed, and its not broken, use it.<br /><br />At home:<br />Save your money, use Thunderbird.<br /><br /><br /><br /><br />I agree the signature thing is weird.Michaelhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15539083960181131347noreply@blogger.com